so she does exist! vanity fair magazine has the exclusive. suri cruise - the mystery child of actors tom cruise and katie holmes is now out there for the world to see in a 22-page family portfolio by famed photographer annie leibovitz.ok - so i know that ms leibovitz is a very credible photographer - and the kid to the left does indeed look like it could have been spawned from the gay cruise and his bad-acting wife - but i don't get it. i feel like photoshop may be to blame.
rumors about celebrities are a dime a dozen - especially about dear old tom - but - let's think about it just for a sec - i mean i'm no cruise expert and never care to be - but this is how i pieced it together (let me know if i left anything out):
1. tom marries nicole kidman
2. they adopt kids
3. rumors fly that he's gay and she's a lesbian (duh)
4. they become scientologists
5. nicole and tom split she wins an academy award and we love her
6. tom goes nuts for bad actress katie holmes
7. rumors fly that it's a publicity stunt (still think it is)
8. tom goes crazy on oprah's couch
9. katie becomes 'pregnant'
10. katie has the kid
11. no pictures or friends are allowed to see this child
12. tom loses his job because he's a crazy gay scientologist
13. bam - pictures of the baby are ready for the world (humm - another publicity stunt?)
result? tom cruise is gay - baby suri is a photoshop job - katie holmes is a bad actress.
3 comments:
No child has ever looked that much like its parents.
It's a robot.
which is why i think she's a product of photoshop - i tell you - this child does not exist.
New lead in the Cruispiracy Theory: Suri is just the four middle letters of Cruise, rearranged.
Talk amongst yourselves...
Post a Comment